But if we are not entitled, from the Derridian point of view, toask if Derrida read Peirce well, we are fully entitled to ask, from the point of view of Peirce, if he would have been satisfiedwith Derrida's interpretation. In Opera aperta, even though stressing the role of the interpreter ready to risk an ideal insomnia in order to pursue infiniteinterpretations, I was insisting that to interpret a text means to interpret that text, not one's own personal drives. A sign is indeed something by knowing which we know something more, but "that I could do something more does notmean that I have not finished it" Boler Brooklyn: A Novel From Everand. In Convivio Dante explains what he intentionally meant in writing his poems.
nest...